UKAS accredited calibration laboratory No. 10723

Book a 20-minute check

Food guidance · 32 questions

Temperature as a critical control point

How HACCP treats temperature: critical limits, monitoring, corrective action, verification and the records an EHO or auditor will ask for, from Regulation 852/2004 and FSA, FSS and FSAI guidance.

Read the guideBook a 20-minute check
Reviewed by Jake Farrow, Managing DirectorLast reviewed 19 October 2026

Regulation 852/2004 requires a HACCP-based system with critical limits, monitoring, corrective action, verification and records, but sets almost none of the numbers. For temperature CCPs the frequency, the alarm, the calibration interval and the record period are yours to decide, justify and write down.

Why it matters

The law gives the principle and leaves you the numbers

For most food manufacturers, temperature is the control that matters most: cooking kills, chilling holds, and cooling between the two is where things go wrong. HACCP turns that into a system: a limit, a way of watching it, a response when it fails, and proof that the system works.

The law is short on numbers. Article 5 of Regulation 852/2004 sets the principles but no monitoring frequency, logging interval, calibration interval or record period. Those are decisions your HACCP team makes and an EHO or auditor tests, which is why the reasoning behind each one matters as much as the number.

What the rules say

Article 5: limits, monitoring, action, verification, records

Article 5 requires 'a permanent procedure or procedures based on the HACCP principles'. For temperature that means 'establishing critical limits at critical control points', 'effective monitoring procedures', 'corrective actions when monitoring indicates that a critical control point is not under control', verification 'carried out regularly', and 'documents and records commensurate with the nature and size of the food business'. Other records are kept 'for an appropriate period'.

The FSA's food safety management guidance puts it in plain terms: set limits for the CCPs, monitor them, put things right when a CCP fails, and 'keep records of your food safety systems, checks and how you've put things right', because 'if your business is involved in a food safety incident, you will need to show your records as evidence'. Records are also the core of the due diligence defence: proof that you 'took all reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence'.

On cooling, Annex II, Chapter IX says foods to be held chilled 'are to be cooled as quickly as possible' after heat processing to a temperature that is not a risk to health. No time is given in UK law. Ireland's Guidance Note 20 gives an industrial profile: start chilling within 90 minutes, core from 55 °C to 10 °C within 120 minutes, then to 3 °C within 60 minutes.

A temperature CCP, end to end
  1. Critical limitA measurable figure with a source, validated for the hazard.
  2. MonitorA method and frequency that catches loss of control in time.
  3. Corrective actionFix the cause, decide on the product, record both.
  4. VerifyReview records, calibrate, audit the plan.
  5. RecordsKept for a defined period with a reason.

The HACCP principles in Article 5 of Regulation 852/2004, applied to a chill or cooling step.

What certification adds

BRCGS Food Safety Issue 9 fills in detail (paraphrased). Clause 2.10.1 asks for monitoring that can detect loss of control and give information in time to act, with continuous measurement such as thermographs as an option. Clause 2.10.2 says CCP records carry date, time and result, are signed by the person monitoring and verified, where appropriate, by an authorised person; electronic records need evidence they were checked. Clause 6.4 covers calibration at a risk-based frequency, traceable to a national standard where possible, and says calibration uncertainty must be considered when equipment is used to assess critical limits (6.4.3). Clause 6.1.4 adds that in-line monitoring devices controlling a process are linked to a failure alert system that is routinely tested. Clause 3.3.2 sets record retention at shelf life plus 12 months as a minimum.

SALSA Issue 7 asks for the same in shorter form: monitored environmental controls with records (1.5.2), external calibration of probes and recorders at a set frequency (1.5.4) and in-house checks (1.5.5), with records kept for shelf life plus one year.

What good looks like

A CCP that holds up at audit

Write the limit as a number with a source: '≤5 °C product, customer specification clause 4.2', not 'cold'. Allow for the instrument: if your probes are ±0.5 °C, an alarm at the limit means a real reading could already be over it. Choose a monitoring method that would see a failure in time, which for an unattended chill overnight means continuous logging with an alarm, not a morning check.

Verification is the part most often thin. Someone other than the person monitoring should review the records on a set cycle, look for repeats and near-misses, and sign. Calibration certificates, alarm tests and HACCP reviews are verification too, so keep them together.

Worked example

A blast chiller that runs slow

This is an illustrative example; times and readings are invented. A manufacturer of cooked chicken has a cooling CCP: core from 75 °C to 5 °C or below within 4 hours, validated for 10 kg trays, with a probe-in-product logger on one tray per batch.

Tuesday 10:00, a batch goes in. 12:00, the logger alarm fires: the core is at 21 °C, behind the validated curve. The shift lead checks the chiller and finds a blocked evaporator fan. 12:20, the batch moves to a second chiller. 14:30, the core reaches 5 °C, 30 minutes past the limit.

What the site does: treats it as a CCP deviation, holds the batch, and the technical manager assesses it against the validation data and the cooling profile, then decides and records the outcome. What changes: the fan is added to the planned maintenance list and the alarm is moved earlier on the curve, so a slow chill is seen at one hour, not two.

Where it is unclear

How often, how long and who signs

Article 5 is silent on monitoring frequency, logging interval and record period, and on how often electronic records must be reviewed; auditors differ on the last point. Cooling times differ widely between guides, from 'as quickly as possible' in law to 90 minutes in Scotland's ButcherSafe and 150 minutes to 3 °C in Ireland's Guidance Note 15. Retention runs from 'an appropriate period' in UK law to fixed periods in Irish law. These are compared under where the rules differ.

Inspection findings

What EHOs and auditors look for

In England, the Food Law Code of Practice scores 'confidence in management' on knowledge of 'hazard analysis/HACCP and the control of critical points' and on 'satisfactory food safety management-based procedures'; the Brand Standard adds that procedures 'cannot be termed satisfactory... if they are not being properly implemented'. The same Code sets inspection frequency, from every 6 months for category A to every 36 months for category E.

On certification audits, published lists of the most common BRCGS non-conformities are led by hygiene, chemical control and equipment, not temperature: a certification body datasheet covering more than 72,000 audits does not list calibration or storage temperature in its top group. We could not verify how often temperature findings occur.

In summary

The short version

  • Article 5 of 852/2004 requires critical limits, monitoring, corrective action, verification and records.
  • UK law gives no frequencies, intervals or record periods: each is a documented HACCP decision.
  • Allow for instrument accuracy when setting alarms against a critical limit.
  • Verification means someone reviews and signs the records, plus calibration and alarm tests.
  • BRCGS asks for shelf life plus 12 months of records; SALSA shelf life plus one year.
  • Cooling has no time in UK law; validate yours and write it down.

Manufacturing and HACCP

Questions, answered from the source

Last checked 19 October 2026. Each answer links to its source and says whether it is law, formal guidance or interpretation.

Can a manufacturer label a product to be stored above 8 °C?Law

Yes, within limits. Paragraph 4(1) of Schedule 4 gives a defence where the manufacturer, preparer or processor has recommended the food is kept 'at or below a specified temperature between 8 °C and ambient temperatures' for no longer than a specified shelf life, the recommendation was communicated by label or other written instruction, the food was not kept above that temperature, and the shelf life had not been exceeded. Paragraph 4(2) says a business must not make such a recommendation 'unless that recommendation is supported by a well-founded scientific assessment of the safety of the food at the specified temperature'.

What's agreed, and what isn't

This is a defence, not an automatic permission: the accused must prove each element. The law does not specify what a 'well-founded scientific assessment' must contain (for example challenge testing or predictive modelling), so the evidence standard is unclear and worth agreeing with the enforcing authority or primary authority. The same wording appears in the Welsh and Northern Ireland regulations; Scotland has no equivalent provision because it has no 8 °C figure.

Status
Law
Applies to
Food manufacturers, Food retail, Food distribution and transport
Last checked
18 October 2026
Does the law say the cold chain must not be broken?Law

Yes. Annex II, Chapter IX, paragraph 5 of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 says raw materials, ingredients, intermediate and finished products likely to support pathogens or toxins 'are not to be kept at temperatures that might result in a risk to health. The cold chain is not to be interrupted.' It continues: 'However, limited periods outside temperature control are permitted, to accommodate the practicalities of handling during preparation, transport, storage, display and service of food, provided that it does not result in a risk to health.'

What's agreed, and what isn't

This is paragraph 5 of Chapter IX (paragraph 2 covers storage conditions generally). The regulation gives no temperature figure and does not specify how long a 'limited period' can be; the national schedules (8 °C and 63 °C in England, Wales and Northern Ireland) and 853/2004 supply figures for some foods. Businesses must define and justify their own excursion limits.

Status
Law
Applies to
Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport, Cold stores, Food retail, Catering
Last checked
18 October 2026
What chilling profile does the FSAI recommend for industrially processed heat-chill foods?Guidance

FSAI Guidance Note No. 20 (Revision 1, 2021), Table 5, recommends starting chilling within 90 minutes of the end of heat processing, cooling the core from 55 °C to ≤10 °C in not more than 120 minutes, then from 10 °C to ≤3 °C in not more than 60 minutes. The product should then go straight into controlled refrigerated storage giving a final product temperature of ≤5 °C, with ≤3 °C recommended throughout the chill chain. Tables 6 and 7 give longer profiles for large uncured and cured meat products (for uncured meats, 55 °C to 12 °C within 360 minutes and a maximum total cooling time of 600 minutes).

What's agreed, and what isn't

These are 'suggested best practice', and GN20 says the onus is always on the operator to prove the safety of its process. GN20 covers pre-packed heat-chill foods distributed to retail and does not apply to caterers selling direct, who use GN15. The ≤5 °C storage figure with a ≤3 °C recommendation differs from England, where the statutory chill limit is 8 °C. All temperatures refer to the geometric core or thickest point.

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Food manufacturers
Last checked
18 October 2026
What sort of temperature failings does an inspector score as minor versus serious on the hygiene rating?Guidance

The Brand Standard's Table 1 describes what each hygiene score looks like in practice. A score of 10 ('some non-compliance... not considered significant in terms of risk') gives the example 'high-risk food held under refrigeration generally below 8°C but some evidence of rising above such as when busy, some lapses in monitoring of critical control points'. A score of 20 describes a 'poor standard of hygienic food handling, temperature control'. A score of 25 ('almost total non-compliance') includes 'inadequate temperature control for high-risk foods', 'food kept out of temperature control' and 'fridge not operating at correct temperature'. Scores of 5 and 0 require safe preparation, cooking, reheating, cooling and storage to be demonstrated.

What's agreed, and what isn't

Because a 5 rating needs no individual score above 5, the score-10 example (fridges drifting above 8 °C when busy, or gaps in CCP monitoring) is on its own enough to cap a business at a 4. The descriptors are illustrations; the Brand Standard says the Code of Practice wording governs and the table complements rather than replaces it. The descriptors do not specify how many readings, or how far above 8 °C, moves a business from one score to the next; that is left to the officer's judgement, so it is worth asking the EHO what they saw if a score is unclear.

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Catering, Food retail, Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport
Last checked
18 October 2026
What storage temperatures does the FSAI expect manufacturers to use when validating chilled shelf life?Guidance

FSAI Guidance Note No. 18 (Revision 5) says 'the recommended temperature for refrigerated storage during distribution, catering and retail in Ireland is ≤5 °C' but that operators should allow for temperature abuse along the chain and by consumers. For Listeria monocytogenes durability studies and challenge tests on chilled ready-to-eat food, it cites the EU Reference Laboratory recommendation of two thirds of the shelf life at 7 °C (described as the 95th percentile of the chill chain in Ireland) and one third at 10 °C (domestic refrigerators).

What's agreed, and what isn't

Testing at 5 °C when the real chain runs warmer risks overestimating shelf life, which is why monitored chain temperatures are useful evidence; GN18 allows a business to use its own known storage temperatures if it justifies them. The PDF linked from the FSAI publication page (dated 4 November 2022) carries 'Draft' and 'Not for publication' watermarks on its pages, so confirm with the FSAI that it is the final text before citing it formally.

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Food manufacturers
Last checked
18 October 2026
Can an EHO serve a notice requiring us to fix our temperature controls, and what happens if we don't?Law

Regulation 6 of the Food Safety and Hygiene (England) Regulations 2013 lets an authorised officer serve a hygiene improvement notice where they have 'reasonable grounds for believing that a food business operator is failing to comply with the Hygiene Regulations'. The notice must state the grounds, specify the failures and the measures required, and set a period 'not being less than 14 days'. Failing to comply is an offence. 'The Hygiene Regulations' means the 2013 Regulations (including the schedule 4 temperature control requirements) and the assimilated EU hygiene regulations such as Regulation 852/2004, so temperature control failures can be the subject of a notice.

What's agreed, and what isn't

Remedial action notices under regulation 9 apply only to establishments that must be approved under Regulation 853/2004; they can prohibit use of equipment, impose conditions on a process or require the rate of operation to be reduced or stopped, and must be served 'as soon as practicable'. Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland have equivalent hygiene improvement notice powers in regulation 6 of their 2006 Food Hygiene Regulations. The FSA Practice Guidance says the choice between a notice, prosecution or both depends on public health risk, evidence, circumstances and the most effective strategy.

Source
The Food Safety and Hygiene (England) Regulations 2013, regulation 6 UK Parliament (legislation.gov.uk), 2013
Status
Law
Applies to
Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport, Cold stores, Food retail, Catering
Last checked
18 October 2026
What does the law say about HACCP monitoring and temperature records?Law

Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 requires food business operators to 'put in place, implement and maintain a permanent procedure or procedures based on the HACCP principles'. These include 'establishing critical limits at critical control points', 'effective monitoring procedures', 'corrective actions when monitoring indicates that a critical control point is not under control', verification procedures 'carried out regularly', and 'documents and records commensurate with the nature and size of the food business'. Article 5(4)(c) requires operators to 'retain any other documents and records for an appropriate period'.

What's agreed, and what isn't

The regulation is silent on the actual numbers: it does not specify monitoring frequency, logging interval, record format, or how long to keep records ('an appropriate period'). Those choices sit with the business and are tested by the enforcing officer or auditor. The procedure must be reviewed when any change is made to the product, process or any step. Quick-frozen food is the exception, with a specific one-year minimum record period under Regulation 37/2005.

Status
Law
Applies to
Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport, Cold stores, Food retail, Catering
Last checked
18 October 2026
What is the due diligence defence, and how do temperature records help?Law

Regulation 12(1) of the Food Safety and Hygiene (England) Regulations 2013 makes it a defence to any offence under those Regulations, including the Schedule 4 temperature offences, to prove the accused 'took all reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence to avoid the commission of the offence'. Section 21 of the Food Safety Act 1990 contains the same defence for offences under Part II of that Act, and is applied to the Quick-frozen Foodstuffs (England) Regulations 2007 by their regulation 10.

What's agreed, and what isn't

Neither provision lists what counts as 'all reasonable precautions'; the law is silent on specific evidence, so it is judged by the court on the facts. Temperature records, alarm response logs and calibration evidence are the usual way a business shows it. If the defence relies on someone else's fault, notice must be served on the prosecutor at least seven clear days before the hearing (s21(5); reg 12(5)). Section 21 extends to England, Wales and Scotland; Northern Ireland has its own Food Safety (Northern Ireland) Order 1991, which we did not check.

Status
Law
Applies to
Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport, Cold stores, Food retail, Catering
Last checked
18 October 2026
Do the GB versions of 852/2004 and 853/2004 apply in Northern Ireland?Guidance

No. In Great Britain these regulations became assimilated law on 1 January 2024, but in Northern Ireland the EU versions continue to apply under the Windsor Framework, enforced through the Food Hygiene Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2006. An FSA explanatory memorandum (11 October 2024) on Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1141 records that 'The Food Hygiene Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2006 provide for the enforcement of Regulation (EC) 853/2004 in Northern Ireland', and that the EU amendment adds flexibility to 'transport meat above the required temperature' and lets fish be held 'for the purpose of slicing for up to 96 hours'.

What's agreed, and what isn't

So 853/2004 temperature rules can differ between Northern Ireland (EU text as amended) and GB (assimilated text on legislation.gov.uk). Northern Ireland operators should check the current EU consolidated text on EUR-Lex, not the legislation.gov.uk 'eur' version, which is the GB text. Goods moving under the NI Retail Movement Scheme can meet UK standards instead. This item rests on the FSA memorandum; we did not fetch the Windsor Framework annex itself.

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport, Cold stores, Food retail, Catering
Last checked
18 October 2026
How are food businesses risk-rated for inspection in Scotland?Guidance

The Interventions Food Law Code of Practice (Scotland) 2019 introduced the Food Law Rating System (FLRS), which combines hygiene and standards. Officers score seven compliance categories, including food safety systems and practice, cross contamination, food safety management systems and confidence in management; the average gives a band A to E within one of three business groups. Group 1 (for example manufacturers of high-risk foods) ranges from 1A, 18 months, to 1D, 3 months; Group 2 (other manufacturers, caterers, distributors of high-risk foods) from 2A, 24 months, to 2D, 3 months; band E in any group means intensive intervention at 1 month. 'Any Food Business with a single Serious (5) Non-compliance automatically gets rated a Band E' (5.10.1).

What's agreed, and what isn't

The Scottish model differs from England's points-based A to E scheme: the bands are not equivalent, and Scotland's highest-risk group can be visited more often (every 3 months at band D). The Code's aide-memoire lists 'Temperature Control' and 'Monitoring Records' among the prompts used when scoring, and refers to audits of 'temperature monitoring'. An FSS-commissioned evaluation (October 2024) reported concerns about local authorities keeping up with FLRS visit frequencies; we have not verified its detail.

Source
Interventions Food Law Code of Practice (Scotland) 2019 Food Standards Scotland, 28 June 2019
Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport, Cold stores, Food retail, Catering
Last checked
18 October 2026
How do our HACCP plan and temperature records affect the 'confidence in management' score?Guidance

The Food Law Code of Practice (England), Annex 1 Part 3, says the confidence in management score judges 'the likelihood of satisfactory compliance being maintained in the future', looking at track record, willingness to act on advice, attitude, knowledge of 'hazard analysis/HACCP and the control of critical points', and 'satisfactory food safety management-based procedures'. A score of 20 includes 'no food safety management procedures or unsatisfactory progress' in developing, documenting and implementing them; a score of 30 includes 'no food safety management procedures'. The Brand Standard adds that HACCP-based procedures 'cannot be termed satisfactory... if they are not being properly implemented', so failures that show non-adherence to them also affect this score (paragraph 3.8).

What's agreed, and what isn't

Record keeping is expected to be proportionate: the Code says the requirement to keep records 'needs to be flexible' for very small businesses and that documentation may not be necessary under the Article 5 flexibility, while larger or more complex operations are expected to have more. The Code also tells officers to reflect reassurance from independent third-party assurance checks at the establishment. It does not specify a format, frequency or retention period for temperature records; those come from the business's own HACCP and industry guides.

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Catering, Food retail, Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport, Cold stores
Last checked
18 October 2026
How does CookSafe expect us to set critical limits and monitor fridges?Guidance

CookSafe uses a fridge as its worked example: 'If the Critical Limit has been set at 5°C, the purpose of Monitoring … would be to check that the Critical Limit of 5°C has been met.' Its suggested limits are chilled delivery and storage 'for example 5°C or below' and frozen 'for example –18°C or below'. For cold monitoring it says check 'the warmest part of the chill', avoid checking straight after the door has been open or 'during a defrost cycle', and that built-in displays show air temperature and 'should be checked regularly with a digital thermometer'.

What's agreed, and what isn't

CookSafe says 'You must determine the frequency of cold temperature monitoring in your House Rules', suggesting start of the working day plus another time in the day; it does not set a minimum. Monitoring may be recorded on its forms, your own forms, 'recording electronically' or a diary, so electronic records are expressly allowed. If a fridge at a 5 °C limit reads 12 °C, its example corrective action is to call the engineer and 'consider if the food is safe to use'. The manual's pages are marked Issue 1.2, May 2012.

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Catering
Last checked
18 October 2026
How does the EHO decide how often to inspect us, and does temperature control affect it?Guidance

The Food Law Code of Practice (England), issued 23 October 2025, Annex 1, scores the potential hazard (type of food and handling, method of processing, consumers at risk), then current compliance, with the hygiene part explicitly including 'temperature control', then confidence in management. The total sets the minimum intervention frequency (Part 4): category A, 92 or higher, 'at least every 6 months'; B, 72 to 91, every 12 months; C, 52 to 71, every 18 months; D, 31 to 51, every 24 months; E, 0 to 30, every 36 months. Manufacturers of high-risk food and wholesalers who re-wrap high-risk food start at 40 points for type of food, caterers handling open high-risk food at 30.

What's agreed, and what isn't

An establishment is 'broadly compliant' if it scores no more than 10 on each of hygiene, structure and confidence in management; for broadly compliant category C premises the Code lets authorities alternate full inspections with other official control methods. The October 2025 Code still uses categories A to E; we found no replacement food hygiene intervention rating scheme in force in England, and a 2025 consultation (outcome published June 2026) covered new-business triage, rating changes after remote controls and category E clarification rather than a new scoring model. Approved (Regulation 853/2004) establishments always get a physical inspection or audit regardless of rating. Wales and Northern Ireland have their own Codes on the same FSA page.

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport, Cold stores, Food retail, Catering
Last checked
18 October 2026
How is a food hygiene rating actually worked out, and where does temperature control come into it?Guidance

Under the FSA's Brand Standard (Revision 8, June 2023), the rating is calculated from three elements of the food hygiene intervention rating scheme in the Food Law Code of Practice: compliance with food hygiene and safety procedures 'including food handling practices and procedures, and temperature control'; compliance with structural requirements; and confidence in management/control procedures (paragraph 3.2). Hygiene and structure are each scored 0 to 25 in steps of 5; confidence in management is scored 0, 5, 10, 20 or 30. The three are added, and the total is mapped to a rating, but the highest single score also caps the rating (Table 3). A total of 0 to 15 with no individual score above 5 gives a 5; a total of 20 with no score above 10 gives a 4; 25 to 30 with no score above 10 gives a 3; 35 to 40 with no score above 15 gives a 2; 45 to 50 with no score above 20 gives a 1; above 50 gives a 0. The Brand Standard's own example: scores of 5, 5 and 20 total 30 but give a rating of 1 (Table 4).

What's agreed, and what isn't

Temperature control sits inside the hygiene element, so one poor temperature finding can cap the whole rating even if structure and management score well. The Brand Standard applies to England; Wales and Northern Ireland use statutory guidance under their own Acts, which the FSA publishes alongside it, but the scoring basis is the same intervention rating scheme. The document says no rating can be based on self-assessment by the business. Scotland does not use this scheme (see the FHIS item).

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Catering, Food retail, Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport, Cold stores
Last checked
18 October 2026
What does the FSA say a HACCP-based system must include for temperature control?Guidance

The FSA says your food safety management system 'must meet the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) principles': identify hazards, identify critical control points, 'set limits for the CCPs', 'monitor the CCPs', put checks in place to make sure the system is working, put things right when a CCP fails, and 'keep records of your food safety systems, checks and how you've put things right'. It adds: 'If your business is involved in a food safety incident, you will need to show your records as evidence.' It lists temperature checks as a usual part of a system.

What's agreed, and what isn't

The FSA's HACCP guidance describes MyHACCP as a free tool 'aimed at small food manufacturing businesses in the UK', including those with 'fifty or fewer employees'; SFBB and Safe Catering are the simpler route for caterers and retailers. The FSA pages do not set monitoring frequencies, critical limit values, record retention or calibration intervals; they are silent and leave these to each business's plan, which your local food safety team can advise on.

Source
Food safety management systems for businesses FSA (published on GOV.UK), undated
Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport, Cold stores, Food retail, Catering
Last checked
18 October 2026
What must CCP temperature monitoring records contain under BRCGS Issue 9, and how is HACCP verified?Guidance

Clause 2.10.1 requires a monitoring procedure for each CCP that can detect loss of control and, wherever possible, give information in time for corrective action; continuous measurement such as thermographs is listed as an option. Clause 2.10.2 says CCP records must include date, time and result, be signed by the person monitoring and verified where appropriate by a competent, authorised person; electronic records need evidence that they were checked and verified. Clause 2.12.2 requires verification procedures, such as internal audits and review of records where limits were exceeded, to confirm the HACCP plan stays effective.

What's agreed, and what isn't

Paraphrased; checked against the standard. For automated monitoring, 'signed' is generally met through electronic sign-off or review, but the standard does not specify how often electronic records must be reviewed; that is unclear and auditors differ. Critical limits must be measurable, for example time and temperature (2.9.1), and validated (2.9.2). SALSA Issue 7 clauses 2.10 to 2.13 cover the same Codex steps in shorter form.

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Food manufacturers
Last checked
18 October 2026
What records does SFBB expect: the daily diary and the 4-weekly review?Guidance

SFBB says the manager should sign the diary every day to confirm the opening and closing checks were done and the safe methods followed. Opening checks include that 'Your fridges, chilled display equipment and freezers are working properly' and that the probe thermometer is working; closing checks include that ''Prove it' checks have been recorded'. The 4-weekly review looks back over four weeks of diary entries; if 'the same thing went wrong three times or more', record why and what you did, and it 'requires completion even if no problems have been found'.

What's agreed, and what isn't

SFBB answers 'Do I need to keep lots of daily records?' with 'No, but as a minimum, you need to fill in the diary each day', adding that larger or more complex businesses may need more. The diary records that checks happened; SFBB does not require the actual fridge readings to be written down each day, though it suggests some temperature checks may be recorded. Whether a business needs logged readings is a decision for its own system and the EHO.

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Catering, Food retail
Last checked
18 October 2026
How much formal food hygiene enforcement do local authorities take, and how much of it is about temperature?Interpretation

The FSA's annual local authority performance paper to its Board (September 2025, covering 2024/25) reports 6,199 formal enforcement actions for food hygiene in 2024/25 across England, Wales and Northern Ireland, a 5% increase on the previous year and 30% above pre-pandemic levels. A March 2026 update gives the pre-pandemic baseline as 4,784 establishments. The same paper reports 61,235 food hygiene complaints in 2024/25 and that the share of due food hygiene interventions carried out rose from about 52% in 2024 to 62% in April 2025.

What's agreed, and what isn't

The published figures are not broken down by the reason for enforcement, so there is no national figure for the share relating to temperature control or HACCP; the FSA papers are silent on this. They also do not split formal action by type (hygiene improvement notices, prohibitions, prosecutions) in the narrative. The FSA links the rise partly to businesses not getting timely inspections. An older GOV.UK statistics series, 'Local Authority Food Law Enforcement Returns', exists; the most recent edition we located there is 2018/19, and we did not check its contents or whether later editions exist elsewhere.

Status
Interpretation
Applies to
Catering, Food retail, Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport, Cold stores
Last checked
18 October 2026
What share of food businesses get a low hygiene rating, and how big is the inspection backlog?Interpretation

Our Food 2024 (FSA and FSS, published June 2025) reports that as of December 2024, 96.9% of businesses in England, Wales and Northern Ireland had a rating of 3 or better, 76.6% (365,133) had a 5, and 3.1% (14,633) scored 2 or below, meaning they 'require substantial improvement'. It reports a backlog in England, Wales and Northern Ireland of 95,000 overdue inspections, including 871 high-risk businesses. Among notified food incidents in 2024, meat and meat products were the largest category (15%), partly linked to poor or insufficient food safety controls, which the report says include 'concerns over temperature controls and poor hygiene during processing or transport of meat'.

What's agreed, and what isn't

Ratings may reflect inspections two or more years old because of the backlog, which the report itself notes. The report does not quantify how many low ratings or incidents involve temperature control; temperature is named only as an example. Figures for Scotland use FHIS and are reported separately (92.6% Pass).

Source
Our Food 2024: An annual review of food standards across the UK FSA and Food Standards Scotland, June 2025
Status
Interpretation
Applies to
Catering, Food retail, Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport
Last checked
18 October 2026
Is there a legal cooling time for cooked food?Law

No fixed time. Annex II, Chapter IX, paragraph 6 of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 says foods to be held or served chilled 'are to be cooled as quickly as possible following the heat-processing stage, or final preparation stage if no heat process is applied, to a temperature which does not result in a risk to health'. Paragraph 7 says thawing is to minimise pathogen growth, foods are to be 'subjected to temperatures that would not result in a risk to health', and risky run-off liquid is to be adequately drained.

What's agreed, and what isn't

The regulation does not specify a cooling time or end temperature; numeric cooling targets come from guidance and the business's HACCP plan. Scotland's Schedule 4, para 2(2)(c), repeats the 'as quickly as possible' wording for food being cooled. For fishery products, 853/2004 says 'Rapid cooling must follow cooking' until 'a temperature approaching that of melting ice' if no other preservation is used.

Status
Law
Applies to
Catering, Food manufacturers, Food retail
Last checked
18 October 2026
Does SFBB say hot food must be cooled within 90 minutes?Guidance

No. The current SFBB caterers 'Chilling down hot food' safe method says to chill cooked food you will not serve immediately 'as quickly as possible and then put it in the fridge', and lists methods (smaller portions, shallow trays, cold water or ice, stirring, a blast chiller). It gives no time limit. Instead it asks you to prove your method once by probing the food after cooking and 'at regular intervals' to see how fast it cools. The FSA temperature control guidance (paragraph 18) says cooling time 'must be consistent with food safety' and that 'Cooling will always be a step that is critical to food safety.'

What's agreed, and what isn't

The widely quoted 90-minute figure is not in the current SFBB caterers pack (we searched the full pack). Other official guidance does give times, and they differ: Northern Ireland's Safe Catering says put cooled food in the fridge or freezer 'within two hours'; Scotland's ButcherSafe says cool small items 'for no longer than 90 minutes at ambient temperature', and gives longer schedules for joints. The law (Regulation 852/2004 Annex II Chapter IX point 6) says only 'as quickly as possible'. Agree a validated cooling time with your EHO or set one in your HACCP plan.

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Catering, Food retail, Food manufacturers
Last checked
18 October 2026
How do hygiene ratings work in Scotland, and how many businesses pass?Guidance

Scotland uses the Food Hygiene Information Scheme (FHIS), run by Food Standards Scotland with the 32 local authorities. An inspection gives either 'Pass' (the business meets the legal food hygiene requirements) or 'Improvement Required' (it 'didn't meet the legal requirements and needs to make improvements'). The FSA and FSS Our Food 2024 review reports that 92.6% of Scottish businesses in the scheme had a Pass as of December 2024, and that 17.2% (12,533 of 72,950) of registered businesses were unrated in December 2024.

What's agreed, and what isn't

FHIS has two outcomes rather than six, so it is not directly comparable with FHRS figures. The FSS consumer page says businesses 'may choose not to display their rating'; it does not say display is mandatory. FHIS outcomes sit on top of the Scottish Food Law Rating System, which is separate from the English intervention rating scheme. FSS does not publish a breakdown of Improvement Required outcomes by cause, so the share relating to temperature control is not known.

Source
Food Hygiene Information Scheme consumer info Food Standards Scotland, undated
Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Catering, Food retail
Last checked
18 October 2026
Is there any official guidance with specific cooling times for cooked meat?Guidance

Yes, FSS's ButcherSafe temperature control house rules. It says 'Active cooling should start within 90 minutes of the end of cooking', with the aim of cooling to 5 °C as quickly as possible through the 'temperature danger zone (from 63˚C to 5˚C)'. Small items such as pies should be cooled 'for no longer than 90 minutes at ambient temperature' before chilled storage. For uncured joints it gives good practice of 1 hour to 50 °C, 6 hours from 50 °C to 12 °C and 1 hour from 12 °C to 5 °C (8 hours total, 10 hours maximum); cured joints such as hams total 10 hours (12½ hours maximum).

What's agreed, and what isn't

This is Scottish guidance for butchers, not a legal limit, and the danger zone it uses (63 °C to 5 °C) differs from the FSA consumer guidance (8 °C to 63 °C). It says the cooling method must be validated and then followed exactly, including quantity and weight. It recommends a calibrated thermograph or data logger where staff are not present to probe at the end of overnight cooking. England's SFBB gives no cooling time.

Source
ButcherSafe: House rules: Temperature control: Guidance Food Standards Scotland, November 2013
Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Food retail, Food manufacturers
Last checked
18 October 2026
Does UK law say how often to check temperatures, when to alarm, or how often to calibrate?Law

No. Regulation 852/2004 Article 5 requires 'effective monitoring procedures', corrective actions and verification 'carried out regularly', with records 'commensurate with the nature and size of the food business', but sets no frequency. Schedule 4 of the England, Wales and Northern Ireland regulations sets the 8 °C and 63 °C limits and time defences but no checking regime. Regulation 37/2005 requires frozen recording 'at frequent and regular intervals' and EN-compliant instruments, but sets no interval.

What's agreed, and what isn't

The law is silent on: how often to check or log (manual checks per day, or logger interval); alarm thresholds and alarm delays; calibration or verification frequency for probes and loggers; temperature mapping of cold rooms or vehicles; and record retention for chilled food (only 'an appropriate period'). These are business decisions that should be written into the HACCP plan with a reason, and agreed with the enforcing authority or certification body where they have a view.

Source
Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs, Article 5 UK Parliament (legislation.gov.uk), 31 December 2020
Status
Law
Applies to
Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport, Cold stores, Food retail, Catering
Last checked
18 October 2026
How long must an Irish food business keep its temperature and HACCP records?Law

Irish law sets the periods. S.I. No. 369 of 2006, Regulation 5, makes it an offence to fail to retain HACCP documents and records for: three months after the expiry of the 'use by' date (Regulation 5(3)); one year after the expiry of the 'best before' or 'best before end' date (Regulation 5(4)); and three months after sale for foodstuffs for immediate consumption (Regulation 5(5)). FSAI Guidance Note 15 repeats these periods for cook-chill records, which should include temperature monitoring and calibration records.

What's agreed, and what isn't

This differs from the UK, where the UK's version of Regulation 852/2004 asks for documents and records 'commensurate with the nature and size of the food business' and no fixed retention period is set in statute. The Irish periods cover records under Article 5 of 852/2004; quick-frozen air temperature recordings have their own minimum of at least one year (S.I. 370/1995, Regulation 7), and traceability records are treated separately. S.I. 369/2006 applies to HSE-supervised businesses; businesses under S.I. 22/2020 should check their own conditions of approval.

Source
S.I. No. 369/2006 - European Communities (Hygiene of Foodstuffs) Regulations 2006 Office of the Attorney General (Irish Statute Book), 12 July 2006
Status
Law
Applies to
Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport, Cold stores, Food retail, Catering
Last checked
18 October 2026
Does the 8 °C rule apply to the air in the fridge or to the food, and does the FSA expect temperature logging?Guidance

The FSA's temperature control guidance (paragraph 27) says: 'The requirement is for the temperature of the food, not the surrounding air.' On monitoring, paragraph 21 says chill holding is 'very often critical to food safety', that 'Temperature monitoring and logging may be helpful as part of food safety management procedures', and that a need for monitoring and record keeping 'commensurate with the nature and size of the business' is indicated by Article 5 of Regulation 852/2004. Paragraph 20 notes SFBB, CookSafe and Safe Catering include 'limited temperature monitoring and recording' to avoid undue burden on smaller businesses.

What's agreed, and what isn't

The guidance does not require loggers, alarms or a set monitoring frequency; it is silent on these and leaves them to the business's HACCP-based procedures. Air readings from a built-in display are a proxy: CookSafe notes displays 'indicate the air temperature', and Safe Catering says for transport 'the temperature of the food is measured and not the temperature of food holding equipment'. Sensor placement and food-simulant probes are a business decision not covered by FSA or FSS guidance.

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport, Cold stores, Food retail, Catering
Last checked
18 October 2026
How does BRCGS Food Safety Issue 9 expect temperature probes and loggers to be calibrated?Guidance

Clause 6.4.1 requires a documented list of measuring equipment used for CCPs and product safety, legality and quality, with location, identification code and calibration due date, protected from unauthorised adjustment and damage. Clause 6.4.2 requires each device to be checked and, where necessary, adjusted at a predetermined, risk-based frequency, to a method traceable to a recognised national or international standard where possible, with results documented. Clause 6.4.3 requires reference equipment to be calibrated with traceability and says calibration uncertainty must be considered when assessing critical limits. Clause 6.4.4 requires recorded actions when a device is found out of limits, and action so at-risk product is not offered for sale.

What's agreed, and what isn't

Paraphrased; checked against the standard. The standard does not specify a calibration interval (for example annual) or an accuracy tolerance; both are left to risk assessment. 'Where possible' softens traceability for working devices, but reference thermometers must be traceable. In practice, protecting at-risk product means looking back at product measured since the last good check; that is good practice rather than the clause's wording, and the standard does not say how far back, so define it in your procedure. SALSA 1.5.4 is similar but lighter. BRCGS Storage and Distribution 6.3 goes further: devices measuring product safety, legality and quality must be traceable to a recognised national standard, with no 'where possible' (6.3.3); the product owner is told when a device is found inaccurate (6.3.5); and self-calibrating devices are verified at a set frequency (6.3.6).

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Food manufacturers, Cold stores, Food distribution and transport
Last checked
18 October 2026
How long must temperature records be kept under BRCGS Food Safety Issue 9?Guidance

Clause 3.3.2 says records must be kept for a defined period, considering legal and customer requirements and product shelf life, including any shelf life extension by the consumer, such as freezing, where stated on the label. 'At a minimum, records shall be retained for the shelf life of the product plus 12 months.' Clause 3.3.1 requires electronic records to be stored securely and backed up.

What's agreed, and what isn't

Paraphrased; checked against the standard. For long-life or frozen products this can mean several years. Issue 9 is silent on a floor for very short shelf-life products beyond the 12 months. BRCGS Storage and Distribution Issue 4 (3.1.3.1) differ: retention reflects shelf life and customer or legal needs 'but shall never be less than 1 year'. SALSA uses shelf life plus one year. Customers may require longer, so check contracts.

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Food manufacturers
Last checked
18 October 2026
How long should we keep temperature records?Guidance

Northern Ireland's Safe Catering pack (FSA) is the only FSA or FSS guide we found that gives a figure: 'It is recommended that you keep records for at least 12 months.' It adds that your legal advisors may recommend longer, or your EHO may ask you to keep them 'at least until his/her next inspection'. It also says records may be useful 'as part of a due diligence defence'.

What's agreed, and what isn't

SFBB is silent on how long to keep the diary or temperature records; it only says to keep purchase records, ideally 'until you are sure that the food they refer to has been consumed without any problems'. Scotland's CookSafe and RetailSafe say HACCP records must be retained 'for an appropriate period of time', and that your enforcement officer can advise on the timeframe. So the period is unclear in law and differs between guides. Many businesses choose at least 12 months, or longer where product shelf life or customer contracts require it.

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Catering, Food retail, Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport, Cold stores
Last checked
18 October 2026
Which Irish law actually governs food hygiene and temperature control, and is S.I. 432/2009 still the one to quote?Law

Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 applies directly in Ireland and is given effect by different statutory instruments depending on who supervises the business. For businesses registered with and supervised by the HSE (most caterers, retailers and many manufacturers of non-animal-origin food) it is the European Communities (Hygiene of Foodstuffs) Regulations 2006 (S.I. No. 369 of 2006), as amended. For businesses supervised by the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, the Sea-Fisheries Protection Authority or local authorities it is the European Union (Food and Feed Hygiene) Regulations 2020 (S.I. No. 22 of 2020). S.I. No. 432 of 2009 (European Communities (Food and Feed Hygiene) Regulations 2009) is no longer current: Regulation 37(1)(a) of S.I. No. 674 of 2019 revoked it, and Regulation 37(1) of S.I. No. 22 of 2020 then revoked the 2019 Regulations.

What's agreed, and what isn't

Enforcement powers (compliance notices, prohibition orders, closure orders) sit in a separate instrument, the European Union (Official Controls in relation to Food Legislation) Regulations 2020 (S.I. No. 79 of 2020), alongside the FSAI Act 1998. S.I. 79/2020 did not replace S.I. 432/2009; its Regulation 36 revoked the Official Control of Foodstuffs Regulations 2010 and 2011. Which instrument applies depends on your supervising authority, so check your registration or approval if you are unsure. S.I. 369/2006 (as made and its four listed amendments), S.I. 22/2020 (as made) and S.I. 79/2020 contain no chill or hot-holding temperature.

Source
S.I. No. 22/2020 - European Union (Food and Feed Hygiene) Regulations 2020 Office of the Attorney General (Irish Statute Book), 27 January 2020
Status
Law
Applies to
Food manufacturers, Food distribution and transport, Cold stores, Food retail, Catering
Last checked
18 October 2026
Are the NSAI Irish Standards I.S. 340 and I.S. 341 recognised, and do we have to follow them?Guidance

The FSAI lists four Irish national guides currently on the EU register under Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004: I.S. 340:2007 Hygiene in the catering sector, I.S. 341:2007 Hygiene in food retailing and wholesaling, I.S. 432:2010 Packaged Groundwater, and the FSAI's Safe Catering guide. Use of such guides is voluntary, as an aid to compliance. NSAI describes I.S. 340 and I.S. 341 as 'voluntary Standards' that cover protecting the cold chain and HACCP, and issued amendments to both in 2015.

What's agreed, and what isn't

The standards are paid documents and their full temperature clauses were not checked for this item; FSAI Guidance Note 18 cites the NSAI 2015 standards as the source of the ≤5 °C recommendation. I.S. 342:2022 (HACCP-based food safety management for food processors, revised May 2022) is an NSAI guidance standard but is not on the FSAI's list of Irish guides on the EU register. Voluntary does not mean irrelevant: inspectors commonly assess against these guides.

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Catering, Food retail, Food distribution and transport
Last checked
18 October 2026
Why does 3 °C matter for vacuum-packed smoked fish and other VP or MAP chilled foods?Guidance

The FSA's guidance on vacuum and modified atmosphere packed chilled foods says non-proteolytic Clostridium botulinum 'is able to grow and produce toxin at 3°C and above'. Where no other controlling factor applies, 'the maximum shelf-life should be 10 days' from packing for foods stored between 3 °C and 8 °C. It names smoked fish among the VP/MAP foods associated with botulism outbreaks. 'Foods stored at less than 3°C are outside the scope of this guidance.'

What's agreed, and what isn't

This is formal guidance (December 2020), not law. If a product is labelled to be kept below 3 °C, the guidance says the business must understand how it will be held after it leaves its control; if it may sit at 3 to 8 °C in transit, retail or at home, the 10-day rule applies from that point. Since December 2020 it no longer applies to VP/MAP fresh beef, lamb and pork, where businesses may apply a 13-day maximum. A below-3 °C label claim makes your chill chain evidence part of the safety case.

Status
Formal guidance
Applies to
Food manufacturers, Food retail, Food distribution and transport
Last checked
19 October 2026

Keep reading

Other topics

20-minute compliance check

How would your next audit or EHO visit go on temperature?

In 20 minutes we go through your stores, vehicles, alarms, calibration and records with you. You get the gaps in writing. No product tour.

Book a 20-minute check

or call 0121 794 8092

Strictly necessary storage (your light or dark choice, and this consent cookie) is always on. Analytics is off unless you turn it on.

Read the cookie policy