If you hold a wholesale dealer's authorisation, the MHRA expects you to store and transport medicines within their labelled conditions and to prove it, and the Responsible Person answers for that proof. This page walks the chain from the RP's desk: storage, monitoring, mapping, transport, returns and outsourcing. The one thing to remember: GDP sets outcomes and leaves most numbers to you, so every interval and limit needs a written, risk-based reason.
Why it matters
Temperature is a licence condition
A wholesaler sits between the manufacturer and every pharmacy, hospital and practice it supplies, so a failure in your store or your van travels downstream to patients who cannot see it. The regulator grades it accordingly: MHRA Guidance Note 6 gives storage of refrigerated products at ambient temperature as a possible Critical finding, and defines a Major as a deficiency that may cause non-compliance with the marketing authorisation, in particular its storage and transport conditions.
Nothing is out of scope because its label is silent. The EMA's GDP Q&A says leaving products with no labelled storage condition unmonitored is not acceptable, because their stability data assume defined climate conditions.
What the rules say
Law, guidelines, then the Inspectorate's view
Regulation 43 of the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 makes compliance with the GDP guidelines a legal condition of the licence, and requires the staff, premises, equipment and quality system needed to maintain product quality. For Great Britain the guidelines are in practice the EU GDP Guidelines 2013/C 343/01 as retained; Northern Ireland follows the Commission's text directly. The MHRA GDP Inspectorate inspects and enforces.
The guidelines set outcomes. The MHRA's detailed interpretation is mostly in Inspectorate blog posts on refrigerated storage, mapping, transport and returns and transport risk. Blogs are not law, but they show what inspectors look for. If you also trade in Ireland, the HPRA publishes formal numbered guides; see MHRA and HPRA compared. If you also hold a manufacturer's licence, see GMP storage, mapping and monitoring.
What Guidance Note 6 asks of the RP
Guidance Note 6 says the RP needs at least one year's practical experience of the licensed activities and the technical knowledge to understand storage conditions, temperature control and transport. They should be continuously contactable, resident in the UK, approve returns to saleable stock and decide the final disposition of returned or rejected products. 'Deputy RP' is not a legally recognised term: you can delegate daily temperature checks, but the named RP keeps the responsibility, receives written reports and keeps records showing oversight.
The mapping blog adds that the RP should be involved in the whole mapping process, supervise routine monitoring and be consulted on any excursion. For applicants, Guidance Note 6 expects mapping with a clear methodology and evidence of transport validation before the first inspection.
What good looks like
Storage and monitoring the inspector will recognise
For fridge lines the 2016 blog expects a pharmaceutical refrigerator: fan-circulated, monitored by a calibrated electronic min/max thermometer accurate to ±0.5 °C that can be read without opening the door, with no ice box. Walk-in cold rooms need an electronic recording device measuring load temperature in one or more places, and alarms for power loss as well as temperature. The freezer blog says most frozen medicines need −15 °C to −20 °C and ice boxes are 'not supported in any circumstance'. In every case, keep the monitoring probe independent of the unit's control probe, as the HPRA and the recorder standard EN 12830 both ask.
EU GDP 3.3 asks for alarms set appropriately and regularly tested, and calibration at risk-based intervals, traceable to a national standard. Section 3.3.1 asks for computerised monitoring to be validated before use, with backups kept at least five years at a separate, secure location, and the MHRA's data integrity guidance does not accept a supplier's validation pack in isolation from your own configuration. Detail is on monitoring and alarms, mapping, justifying probe positions and records.
An RP's routine, from the sources
No single source gives a calendar, so this one is assembled from several. Where a frequency is a minimum from one source rather than a UK rule, it says so.
- Every day: read or review the monitoring for every area, record any deviation and the action taken, and tell the RP (MHRA 2016 blog). WHO goes further with twice-daily checks, seven days a week.
- Every consignment: check incoming cold chain deliveries and review the temperature data for outgoing ones (MHRA 2016 blogs).
- Routinely: the RP reviews and signs off the records (MHRA); the HPRA asks for a monthly review in Ireland.
- Every six months: test alarms at their set points, if you follow WHO's minimum; EU GDP gives no interval.
- Every year: calibrate transport monitoring equipment (EU GDP 9.2, at least annually) and service fridges (MHRA blog, at least annually).
- At self-inspection: review the mapping risk assessment and re-mapping interval (MHRA mapping blog).
In SematicsScheduled intraday check reports, repeating at whatever interval you set, with minimum, maximum and average for every asset, every alarm and its actions, and time within limits. Set them to your checking frequency.How it works: Intraday check reports
Transport, returns and outsourcing
Your responsibility runs to the customer's door, and the 2020 blog says ex-works terms do not change that. Every route needs a risk assessment, qualified vehicles or packaging, and monitoring or a validation sound enough to stand in for it; the transport page covers this in full.
Returns are where control is easiest to lose. EU GDP 6.3 allows a fridge line back into stock only with documented evidence that it stayed in its authorised conditions throughout: delivery, examination, opening and repacking, collection and return to your fridge. Chapter 7 makes you responsible for anything you outsource, with a written contract, an audit before work starts and no subcontracting without your approval, and section 3.2 says contracted storage premises should hold their own authorisation. We recommend the written agreement also requires the contractor to report any excursion to you within one working day of the event, with the data (our recommendation; GDP sets no deadline).
Worked example
An RP's Monday morning
This is an illustrative example; the site, times and readings are invented.
08:15. The RP reviews the weekend alarm log. Cold room 2 alarmed at 02:40 on Sunday and reached 8.9 °C for 35 minutes before the on-call operative closed a door left ajar. What they do: check the stock positions against the mapping, quarantine the affected batches, ask the marketing authorisation holder for stability data, and decide disposition on that evidence. What they record: the deviation, the root cause, the MAH reply, the decision and a CAPA for door alarms.
10:00. A customer without a wholesale authorisation asks to return a fridge line delivered on Friday. It has no record of how the stock was kept since delivery, and the return falls outside the MHRA's 24-hour window, so the RP declines, as EU GDP 6.3 requires evidence of storage throughout.
11:30. A proof of delivery shows the courier used a subcontractor nobody approved. Chapter 7 requires your prior evaluation, so the RP raises it with the courier and books an audit.
Where it is unclear
Where the numbers disagree
Much of the detail a wholesaler needs is either unstated or contested. Returns windows run from the MHRA's 24 hours for refrigerated returns in GB to EU GDP's 'for example 10 days', which is not the UK expectation (returns). RP experience is one year for the MHRA and six months for the HPRA (RP experience). Transit storage is 36 hours for the MHRA and 48 for the HPRA (storage in transit).
Intervals are left to you: re-mapping, alarm testing and calibration have no single UK figure. And the MHRA discourages mean kinetic temperature in wholesale "without robust supporting information and methodology".
Inspection findings
What the 2016 deficiency data show
The MHRA GDP Inspection Deficiency Data 2016, explained on the Inspectorate blog, sampled 148 of 1,428 inspections and counted major findings only. The quality system drew a Major in 22% of sampled inspections, transportation in 13%, the RP in 12%, and temperature control under section 3.2.1 in 9%.
The temperature examples are specific. Mapping did not show the areas were suitable or where thermometers should go; cold chain deviations were recorded but never put through CAPA; a warehouse thermometer was not calibrated across its operating range; a fridge had ice build-up, read 0.6 °C and had unrecorded changes to its dial; and an RP admitted adding fabricated readings to fill gaps. Transport findings included uncontrolled ambient delivery with no risk assessment, uncalibrated transport monitoring and 'customer collects' arrangements never formalised. The report itself recommends not using these deficiencies "as a point of focus at the expense of risks that may be higher for their particular organisation".
This is the only GDP-specific dataset found on GOV.UK. The 2023 symposium reported 1,189 deficiencies across 473 inspections without a published breakdown.
MHRA GDP Inspection Deficiency Data 2016: 148 of 1,428 inspections sampled, Majors only. Four of the areas reported.
In summary
The short version
- Treat GDP as a licence condition: regulation 43 makes it law, the guidelines set the detail.
- Make sure the named RP can show oversight of every delegated temperature check.
- Map, monitor, alarm and calibrate every storage area, and validate the monitoring system for your use.
- Control every route to the customer's door, including couriers and ex-works collections.
- Accept cold chain returns only with evidence of storage throughout.
- Put CAPA behind every deviation, and never back-fill a missed reading.
- Where the sources differ, assess the risk and record your reasoning.